2013年5月25日星期六

it was expected that design professionals would have high interest in design


Consumers’ perceptions might be influenced in several ways by
the coded sensory system contained in products’ visual aesthetics.
Product appearance is the first thing that connects a product with
a potential buyer followed by evaluations based on this sensory
connection (Hollins and Pugh, 1990). Due to their coded sensory
system, visual aesthetics have a symbolic function that can influence
product evaluation. Visual appearance is actively considered
in product comparisons and is a key determinant of purchase
satisfaction (Bloch et al., 2003). Visual product aesthetics are significant
elements of product categories regarded as extensions of
the self (e.g. dress) due to the role of the coded sensory system in
identity expression.
In general, consumers prefer visual over verbal processing
(Childers et al., 1985; Holbrook, 1986). Highly visual consumers
may weigh aesthetic elements higher than less visual consumers
when making product choices. Consumer groups vary in sensitivity
to visual product aesthetics. Bloch et al. (2003, p. 558) noted
that ‘based on training, experience, and career demands typical of
these individuals, it was expected that design professionals would
have high interest in design and consider visual aesthetics to be
highly central’. Indeed, a group of design professionals did score
significantly higher on the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics
scale than samples from the general population. In one study, the
most preferred perceptual modalities of a sample of US fashion
design and merchandizing students were interactive (oral communication),
followed by kinesthetic (body movement) and visual
(viewing pictures, images, objects or activities). Touching and
smelling objects (haptic, olfactory) were ranked low by students as
means to acquire information (Workman, 2000). Results of a
recent cross-cultural survey of fashion design and merchandizing
students indicated that students preferred interactive, visual and
kin esthetic modalities while haptic and olfactory modalities were
less preferred by students from all three cultures (Caldwell et al.,
2005). yanzic0525.


没有评论:

发表评论